Wearable Tech World Feature Article
July 28, 2015

Nike Settles FuelBand Lawsuit, Will Give Partial Refund

Nike and Apple have reached a settlement in a class-action lawsuit that claims that the Nike FuelBand, a wearable fitness tracker that was developed in conjunction with Apple, does not perform as advertised. The central allegations to the suit are that the FuelBand cannot track steps or calories burned as accurately as claimed, and also that Nike violated the terms of the product’s warranty. As per the terms of the settlement, consumers who purchased a FuelBand between January 19, 2012 and June 17 of this year are entitled to either a $15 cash payout or a $25 gift card from Nike.

The Nike FuelBand sells itself as a health and fitness tracker in the same vein as the Fitbit or Jawbone UP. It acts as a pedometer, measuring steps taken, speed, and calories burned, among other statistics, and shares that information by syncing with a smartphone application to give users feedback about their health habits. The lawsuit alleges that this information is likely not at all accurate. Although Nike and Apple did elect to settle this suit outside of a court of law, they maintain a denial of wrongdoing and claim that they wished to settle out of court only to avoid a lengthy and expensive legal proceeding.

Despite this claim by Nike, questions are still being raised about the security and accuracy of wearable technology. Especially in wearable tech that is aimed at health and wellness, making sure that the information generated is accurate and protected is of utmost importance, especially as these devices become more and more innovative. Jay Sales, an Innovation Strategist at VSP Global, will be leading a discussion on this very topic at our Wearable Tech Expo in Las Vegas this August (18th-20th). This idea of making wearable tech devices more accurate and secure needs to be a central one as development in the industry moves forward.

While this settlement seems like a blow for the Nike FuelBand, TMC contributor Peter Bernstein says: “Settling fraudulent advertising claims before they go to court without an admission of wrong doing is the rule rather than the exception in the U.S. for a host of reasons. Realities are, especially in a social media world where vendor claims can quickly be aimed by disgruntled consumers, this may be the best way to assure what is promised is delivered.”  In the same breath, however, consumers must take all the information they have access to into account when making a purchase. “Buyer beware,” Bernstein says. Consumers must be “diligent in researching their purchases.” 

Edited by Dominick Sorrentino

Comments powered by Disqus

Featured Video

Dedicated to Wearable Tech: Mobile, Sports, Fitness, Audio, Fashion, Design

Featured Podcasts

The Business of Wearable Computing: An Interview with Brand Finance An interview with Edgar Baum, Managing Director North America with Brand Finance, the world’s leading brand valuation and strategy consultancy. Mr. Baum specializes in marketing ROI and financially quantified brand strategy.
Getting Attention for Your Wearables Joe Daniels of Loeb & Loeb discusses how wearable tech entrepreneurs can gain exposure for their ideas and what to do once they've won attention from potential investors.
Wearable Success Rides on Actionable Intelligence Lux Capital's Adam Goulburn focuses on the traits sought by investors as they consider wearable startups, such as how well their software turns collected data into actionable intelligence.
Wearable Tech Startup Strategy CRV's George Zachary talks wearable startups and how they can secure the attention of the right investors as the seek to become the next great thing in wearables.
How to Win the Wearable Tech Funding Game Donatella Giacometti speaks with Canary Ventures' Alex Goldberg about what the investment community looks for in startups, such as the many new wearable tech companies that are emerging.

Wearable Tech World Media Sponsors